Agencies Should Teach Brands How to Fish

Jeremiah Owyang has a great post and slideshow this morning titled “The Social Reef”:

It is his explanation of the social media ecosystem.  I read it this morning and was immediately struck that it never occurred to him to put agencies into this landscape.  He responded to my tweet and wanted to think about where we would fit. Below is my take on where agencies belong:

Agencies role in the social media ecosystem is as educators and enablers for brands.  To extend the analogy, agencies should teach brands how to fish in the social media reef.  Brand managers are overworked as-is and need help getting up to speed on the ever-evolving social media world.  Agencies role is to serve as experts on these technologies and the social norms of each social media service.  Agencies can and should also launch campaigns into these spaces but the more important role is to enable brands to get active in the space.  There are many types of education that need to happen:

  • Social Media 101 – This usually starts with a slide featuring the hundreds of social media services available and the dives deep on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, ect.  This is great to force marketers to start consuming and playing with social media. I’m a firm believer that no one should do anything in this space until they’re an active consumer of all forms of it. I think our challenge as agencies is to make sure we teach brands more than the basics.  How do we create the next @zappos?
  • Social Media 300 – This is where we teach brands to jump in and therefore about the norms of the social media community and how to give back in a meaningful way.  It should also include a push to innovate – this is a new space and there’s a million new things to do.  Look at the success CPB and Burger King had with “Whopper Sacrifice”!
  • ENG 371WR:Writing for Nonreaders in the Postprint Era just kidding about this one but click through and read the hysterical McSweeney piece

Agencies here is defined broadly.  Right now it is unclear who owns social media but everyone wants to.  PR agencies have been active in the space both in educating clients and in putting together campaigns for them.  Ad agencies were slower to jump in but now all are watching the space and some are actively engaging.  New models/agencies are popping up – places like Chris Brogan’s “New Marketing Labs”. 

What do you think? Do Agencies belong in the social media ecosystem? If so, in what way?

  • I think agencies need to lead brands into the space. Unlike PR shops or new creations like Brogan's New Media Lab, agencies have their fingers in lots of touchpoints and if they're doing the job, have deep insights into the clients core biz issues. So they more so than any other entity are best positioned to guide clients on their first big dive into the social media waters.

    Problem is, most agencies just don't have that one or few SocMe knowledge leaders. Folks that have spent the time deep diving in the space so they can actually speak intelligently and insightfully to clients.

    The big shops should have them, but for whatever reason don't. The small shops are trying but the folks that get it are far and few between and pretty damn expensive because they're in demand.

    It's going to be a long road for us agency folks, but those that get their act together first stand a good chance of vastly improving their future I think.
  • JMaultasch
    Thanks for the comment Tom. I agree that big agencies should do this and yet we've got a long haul before we start doing it well. I wonder if part of the issue isn't that social media stars are becoming traffic drivers and therefore hiring one sort or pre-determines the succcess of your SM activity. For example, Pistachio gets paid a consulting fee and then uses her huge following to promote the social media effort she's consulted on. Does this make her a better guide to social media or just a good source of traffic? I think I may explore the notion of SM experts as the new key opinion leaders in my next post.
  • Interesting thought re: Pistachio.. reminds me of PR folks with the golden rolodex. You hire them because it gets your brand instant access to the right reporters.

    No, I think the problem is a supply/demand. Agencies want to hire someone as a W2 employee and lock that talent up in their 4 walls. Then tell clients "look we have something the other guys don't." Problem is there just aren't that many folks that *really* get the space and none of them really wants to go work for an ad agency. They prefer independence.

    The model I think will prevail over the next few years -- agencies find smart SocMe consultants and hire those folks to teach the agency how to build a SocMe mindset/practice area into the agency. Will help if the SocMe person has an agency background I think. Understanding how agencies make money will be invaluable asset in helping agencies understand how to profitably structure a new SocMe practice area. IMHO. So these *guides* will be paid to get an agency SocMe smart and then retained to keep that agency SocMe smart going forward. Probably be some kind of limited conflict of interest stuff to work out -- if you work with us you can't work for the following agencies, etc. -- the big holding companies will benefit the most because they'll be able to lock up a consultant or two to only work with their network agencies. Will make it hard on the *little guys* but that is my 02 on how our industry will try and quickly get into the SocMe game.

    Look forward to your post.
    @TomMartin
  • Justin
    Now that the whole world has found out about twitter and facebook what is the next thing? I am ready to move on, being the early adapter that i am.
  • Twitter Comment






    Agencies Should Teach Brands How to Fish [link to post]

    - Posted using Chat Catcher
blog comments powered by Disqus